• Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. · Nov 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Lidocaine-prilocaine cream as analgesia for hysterosalpingography: a randomized, double blinded, controlled study.

    • Baldomero Arnau, Esther Jovell, Marino Romero, Manuela Gonzalez, Lola Esteba, and Araceli Garcia.
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Crta. Torrebonica s/n, 08227 Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: barnau@cst.cat.
    • Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014 Nov 1; 182: 216-9.

    ObjectiveThe efficacy of lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA(®)) analgesia in the practice of hysterosalpingography is controversial. This study provides new drill results and a new method of application in terms of mode, time and place. The aim of the paper is to investigate the efficacy of 5% lidocaine 25 mg-prilocaine 25 mg/g cream applied to the uterine cervix for reducing pain during hysterosalpingography.Study DesignA randomized, double blinded, controlled study set in the general gynaecology clinic of a university teaching hospital between September 2012 and June 2013. One hundred successive patients programmed to undergo hysterosalpingography were randomized to either 3 ml of EMLA (50) cream or 3 ml of placebo (50), placed endocervically and exocervically, 10 min before hysterosalpingography. Patients' intensity of pain was assessed in four steps: at baseline (speculum application), after application of Pozzi tenaculum and cannula on the uterine cervix, during cervical traction and after contrast medium injection, using a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) immediately after the procedure. The most painful step was also identified. VAS was administered again at one-month follow-up visit.Trial RegistrationNCT01303614.ResultsThe contrast medium injection was the most painful step of hysterosalpingography in both groups (EMLA 3.96, placebo 4.54, 95%CI: -0.481 to 1.641). No differences were found between the two groups (P=0.281) during this step. When comparing the VAS scale after the application of Pozzi tenaculum and cannula (EMLA 1.06, placebo 3.34, 95%CI: 1.495-3.065) and after cervical traction (EMLA 2.54, placebo 3.46, 95%CI: 0.034-1.806), significantly less pain was experienced by the EMLA group than the placebo group: P=0.000 and P=0.042, respectively.ConclusionEndocervical and exocervical topical application of EMLA 10 min before performing hysterosalpingography significantly reduced pain during cervical manipulation with tenaculum and cannula and during cervical traction, but did not reduce pain during injection of contrast that was the most painful step.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.