• Annals of surgery · Sep 2012

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    United States Military Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Group (USMCI GI-01) randomized controlled trial comparing targeted nodal assessment and ultrastaging with standard pathological evaluation for colon cancer.

    • Aviram Nissan, Mladjan Protic, Anton J Bilchik, Robin S Howard, George E Peoples, and Alexander Stojadinovic.
    • Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
    • Ann. Surg.. 2012 Sep 1;256(3):412-27.

    ObjectiveOur randomized controlled trial previously demonstrated improved staging accuracy with targeted nodal assessment and ultrastaging (TNA-us) in colon cancer (CC). Our objective was to test the hypothesis that TNA-us improves disease-free survival (DFS) in CC.MethodsIn this randomized trial, targeted nodal assessment and ultrastaging resulted in enhanced lymph node diagnostic yield associated with improved staging accuracy, which was further associated with improved disease-free survival in early colon cancer.ResultsClinical parameters of the control (n = 94) and TNA-us (n = 98) groups were comparable. Median (interquartile range) lymph node yield was higher in the TNA-us arm: 16 (12-22) versus 13 (10-18); P = 0.002. Median follow-up was 46 (29-70) months. Overall 5-year DFS was 61% in the control arm and 71% in the TNA-us arm (P = 0.11). Clinical parameters of node-negative patients in the control (n = 51) and TNA-us (n = 55) groups were comparable. Lymph node yield was higher in the TNA-us arm: 15 (12-21) versus 13 (8-18); P = 0.03. Five-year DFS differed significantly between groups with node-negative CC (control 71% vs TNA-us 86%; P = 0.04). Survival among stage II CC alone was higher in the TNA-us group, 83% versus 65%; P = 0.03. Adjuvant chemotherapy use was nearly identical between groups. TNA-us stratified CC prognosis; DFS differed significantly between ultrastaged and conventionally staged node-negative patients [control pN0 72% vs TNA-us pN0(i-) 87%; P = 0.03]. Survival varied according to lymph node yield in patients with node-negative CC [5-year DFS: <12 lymph nodes = 57% vs 12+ lymph nodes = 85%; P = 0.011] but not in stage III CC.ConclusionsTNA-us is associated with improved nodal diagnostic yield and enhanced staging accuracy (stage migration), which is further associated with improved DFS in early CC. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov under the registration number: NCT01623258.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…