• W Hollingworth, C Todd, M Parker, J A Roberts, and R Williams.
• Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge.
• BMJ. 1993 Oct 9; 307 (6909): 903-6.

ObjectiveTo ascertain the economic impact of an early discharge scheme for hip fracture patients.DesignPopulation based study comparing costs of care for patients who had "hospital at home" as an option for rehabilitation and those who had no early discharge service available in their area of residence.SettingDistrict hospital orthopaedic and rehabilitation wards and community hospital at home scheme.Patients1104 consecutively admitted patients with fractured neck of femur. 24 patients from outside the district were excluded.Main Outcome MeasuresCost per patient episode and number of bed days spent in hospital.ResultsPatients with the hospital at home option spent significantly less time as inpatients (mean of 32.5 v 41.7 days; p < 0.001). Those patients who were discharged early spent a mean of 11.5 days under hospital at home care. The total direct cost to the health service was significantly less for those patients with access to early discharge than those with no early discharge option (4884 pounds v 5606 pounds; p = 0.048).ConclusionsAbout 40% of patients with fractured neck of femur are suitable for early discharge to a scheme such as hospital at home. The availability of such a scheme leads to lower direct costs of rehabilitative care despite higher readmission costs. These savings accrue largely from shorter stays in orthopaedic and geriatric wards.

20 keywords...

hide…