• Jae Suk Yoo, Joon Bum Kim, Sung-Ho Jung, Suk Jung Choo, Cheol Hyun Chung, and Jae Won Lee.
• Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.. 2014 Nov 1;148(5):2101-7.

BackgroundSurgical repair of a descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (DTA/TAAA) involving the distal arch is challenging and requires either deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) or crossclamping of the distal arch. The aim of this study was to compare these 2 techniques in the treatment of DTA/TAAA involving the distal arch.MethodsFrom 1994 to 2012, 298 patients underwent open repair of DTA/TAAA through a left thoracotomy. One hundred seventy-four patients with distal arch involvement who were suitable for either DHCA (n=81) or arch clamping (AC; n=93), were analyzed. In-hospital outcomes were compared using propensity scores and inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting adjustment to reduce treatment selection bias.ResultsEarly mortality was 11.1% in the DHCA group and 8.6% in the AC group (P=.58). Major adverse outcomes included stroke in 16 patients (9.2%), low cardiac output syndrome in 15 (8.6%), paraplegia in 10 (5.7%), and multiorgan failure in 10 (5.7%). After adjustment, patients who underwent DHCA were at similar risk of death (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; P=.80) and permanent neurologic injury (OR, 0.95; P=.92) to those who underwent AC. Although prolonged ventilator support (>24 hours) was more frequent with DHCA than with AC (OR, 2.60; P=.003), DHCA showed a tendency to lower the risk of paraplegia (OR, 0.15; P=.057).ConclusionsCompared with AC, DHCA did not increase postoperative mortality and morbidity, except for prolonged ventilator support. However, DHCA may offer superior spinal cord protection to AC during repair of DTA/TAAA involving the distal arch.Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

34 keywords...

hide…