• J Radiol · Mar 2008

    Comparative Study

    [Value of double reading of whole body CT in polytrauma patients].

    • C Agostini, M Durieux, L Milot, I Kamaoui, B Floccard, B Allaouchiche, and F Pilleul.
    • Service de Réanimation chirurgicale du Pavillon G, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CHU Edouard Herriot, 3, place d'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France.
    • J Radiol. 2008 Mar 1; 89 (3 Pt 1): 325-30.

    PurposeTo assess the value of standard double reading of whole body CT in the management of polytrauma patients.Materials And MethodsProspective study between January and July 2005. Two senior radiologists with expertise in trauma imaging, blinded to clinical findings, reviewed 105 initial CT examinations of polytrauma patients. These examinations had initially been interpreted by the on-call radiologist. The second interpretations were performed within 12 hours of admission, and were considered the gold standard.ResultsA total of 105 patients were included with 82 males (78%) and 23 females (22%), aged between 2 and 83 years. The level of admission was graded III (n=64), II (n=30) and I (n=11). The second reading identified 3 lesions that were not initially described, each requiring a change in management, including splenic rupture (n=1), thoracic spine fracture (n=1) and epidural hematoma (n=1), with no unfavorable impact on mortality. Additional errors in the initial interpretation were identified: peripheral fractures (n=38), chest (n=36), brain (n=31), abdominal (n=28), spine (n=19) and maxillofacial (17) lesions and contrast extravasation (n=6).ConclusionBased on the large number and severity of some lesions missed at initial interpretation of whole body CT of polytrauma patients, we recommend standard double reading of these examinations.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…