• Rofo · Nov 2019

    Comparative Study

    Optimization of Whole-Body CT Examinations of Polytrauma Patients in Comparison with the Current Diagnostic Reference Levels.

    • Stefan B Schäfer, Claudia Rudolph, Martin Kolodziej, Frank Mauermann, Fritz Christian Roller, and Gabriele Anja Krombach.
    • Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University-Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany.
    • Rofo. 2019 Nov 1; 191 (11): 1015-1025.

    Purpose Evaluation of the dose values of a polytrauma whole-body CT examination used in clinical practice with regard to the 2016 updated diagnostic reference levels and reduction of the mean exposure levels using simple optimization steps.Materials And Methods In each case, 100 exposure values before and after dose optimization were compared with the old and new diagnostic reference levels. The grayscale values and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were determined for the lung, the aortic arch and the liver. A visual assessment of the image quality was performed by two radiologists on the basis of a Likert scale (0 - non-diagnostic, 1 - poor visualization, 2 - moderate visualization, 3 - good visualization, 4 - excellent visualization) for CT examinations both before and after optimization.Results The acquired exposure values after dose optimization were below the old and new diagnostic reference levels (1319.98 ± 463.16 mGy · cm) while the mean value of the exposure values before optimization (1774.96 ± 608.78 mGy · cm) exceeded the current diagnostic reference levels. The measured grayscale values (HU) were (before versus after optimization): lung - 833 HU vs. - 827 HU (p = 0.43), aortic arch 341 HU vs. 343 HU (p = 0.70) and liver 68 HU vs. 67 HU (p = 0.35). After dose optimization the SNR in the lung was minimally higher, while it was minimally lower in the two other regions than before the optimization. Visual assessment of the image quality showed almost identical values with 3.85 evaluation points before and 3.82 evaluation points after dose optimization (p = 0.57).Conclusion Due to the updating of the diagnostic reference levels, an analysis of the own exposure values is necessary in order to be able to detect high values promptly and to initiate appropriate measures for dose reduction. Appropriate adaptation of the examination parameters with consideration of the necessary image quality allows a significant reduction of the radiation exposure in most cases, also on CT devices of older generations.Key Points· In many cases a dose reduction below the DRLs is already possible by optimizing the examination technique.. · In order to ensure a diagnostic image quality, the control of the image quality is unavoidable in a dose reduction.. · Through suitable parameter adjustments a compliance with the DRLs is also possible, using CT devices of older generation without iterative image reconstruction..Citation Format· Schäfer SB, Rudolph C, Kolodziej M et al. Optimization of Whole-Body CT Examinations of Polytrauma Patients in Comparison with the Current Diagnostic Reference Levels. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2019; 191: 1015 - 1025.© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.