• Akira Mibu, Tomohiko Nishigami, Katsuyoshi Tanaka, Masahiro Manfuku, Satoko Yono, Saori Kajiwara, Akihito Tanabe, and Masahiko Shibata.
• Department of Nursing and Physical Therapy, Konan Women's University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan; Department of Pain Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan; Department of Rehabilitation, Tanabe Orthopedics, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
• J Orthop Sci. 2018 Nov 1; 23 (6): 895-901.

BackgroundPrevious studies suggest that life satisfaction assessment using the Life Satisfaction checklist (LiSat-11) is a meaningful outcome measure and may play an important role in setting rehabilitation goals in patients with chronic pain. Until now, there was no Japanese version of this questionnaire, and the psychometric properties of the original version of the LiSat-11 have only been investigated using classical test theory approaches. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the LiSat-11-J using Rasch analysis in a sample of Japanese people with low back pain (LBP).MethodsOne hundred and two participants with LBP completed the LiSat-11-J. Concurrent Validity of the LiSat-11-J was investigated by examining the relationships between the LiSat-11-J and clinical valuable. Rasch analysis was used to assess targeting, category ordering, unidimensionality, person fit, internal consistency, and differential item functioning.ResultsThe LiSat-11-J was significantly correlated with disability, pain-related catastrophizing, fear of movement, anxiety, and depression. The LiSat-11-J targeted the participants with low life satisfaction and had unidimensionality, good internal consistency, and good test-retest reliability. Responses to category 1 ("very dissatisfying") and 2 ("dissatisfying") were disordered. After collapsing these two categories into a single new category, targeting function and category order showed a little improvement.ConclusionThe LiSat-11-J has unidimensionality, acceptable internal consistency, good test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity to the assessment of pain-related disability and psychological factors. However, targeting function and category order were not well. These two components showed improvement by rescoring category, but not sufficient. These results suggest that the LiSat-11-J is not well adequate to apply as an assessment tool of life satisfaction to the patients with LBP.Copyright © 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…