• Eur. J. Med. Res. · Feb 2006

    Assessment of the extent of metastases of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors using whole-body PET, CT, MRI, PET/CT and PET/MRI.

    • Marcus D Seemann, G Meisetschlaeger, J Gaa, and E J Rummeny.
    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University, Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany. m.seemann@lrz.tum.de
    • Eur. J. Med. Res. 2006 Feb 21; 11 (2): 58-65.

    ObjectiveTo assess the diagnostic value of whole-body positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the fusion of PET and CT (PET/CT) and PET and MRI (PET/MRI) in the detection of metastatic disease of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors.Materials And MethodsThis prospective study included six patients with extensive nonresectable metastases of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors which were consecutively examined from the base of the skull to the proximal thigh using a state-of-the-art PET/CT scanner and a 1.5 Tesla whole-body MRI scanner. PET was performed with a carbohydrated F-18-labeled somatostatin-receptor ligand ([ superset18 F]FP-Gluc-TOCA) using a Pico-3D PET scanner. CT was performed with a venous-dominant contrast-enhanced phase using a 16-slice CT scanner. MRI was performed with a coronal T2-weighted Half-Fourier Acquired Single-Shot Turbo Spin Echo (HASTE) sequence, a coronal T2-weighted Turbo-Short Tau Inversion-Recovery (STIR) sequence, a coronal T1-weighted Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) sequence and a high resolution axial T2-weighted TSE sequence. The data sets from PET and CT were fused automatically. The PET and MRI data sets were fused manually. Lesions were rated as metastases if they were not clearly identified as benign lesions according to standard radiological criteria.ResultsFor PET, CT, MRI, PET/CT, and PET/MRI, the lesion-by-lesion based analysis showed an overall detection rate for liver metastases (n = 391) of 49.9% (P<.001), 37.1% (P<.001), 98.2%, 50.9% (P<.001) and 100%, for lymph node metastases (n = 37) of 91.9%, 83.8%, 64.9%, 100% and 97.3% and for osseous metastases (n = 12) of 100%, 8.3% (P<.005), 66.7%, 100% and 100%.ConclusionsPET as single modality revealed the most lymph node and osseous metastases. MRI as single modality revealed the most liver metastases. The combination of molecular/metabolic with anatomical/ morphological information improves the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of metastases in comparison to the single modalities. Whole-body PET/MRI is a very promising diagnostic modality for oncological imaging due to the missing radiation exposure and the high soft tissue resolution of MRI in contrast to CT.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…