• Michele Romano, Francesca Buffoli, Luca Tomasi, Lettieri Corrado, Maria Rosa Ferrari, and Roberto Zanini.
• Division of Cardiology, C. Poma Hospital, Mantova, Italy. m67romano@hotmail.com
• Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 May 1; 71 (6): 759-63.

BackgroundDrug eluting stents (DES) have recently been proven to further reduce restenosis and revascularization rate in comparison to bare metal stents in elective procedures. Most early DES trials did not include patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation MI, because these patients tend to have lower restenosis rates than other patient groups and delayed endothelization of these stents raises concern about a possible increase of thrombotic complications in the setting of STEMI.AimTo confirm the safety and effectiveness of DES in patients with STEMI in a real-world scenario.MethodsFrom January 2004 to December 2006, clinical and angiographic data of 370 patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI have been analyzed. Patients were retrospectively followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE): death, reinfarction and target vessel revascularization (TVR).ResultsOverall, 120 patients received DES (32%, DES group) and 250 received bare metal stents (68%, BMS group) in the infarct related artery. Compared with the BMS group, DES patients were younger, (mean age 56 +/- 12 vs. 65 +/- 10; P < 0.001) had more often diabetes mellitus (47% vs. 14% P < 0.001), anterior localization (65% vs. 45%; P < 0.0011) and less cardiogenic shock at admission (4% vs. 7%; P < 0.001). The angiographic characteristics in the DES group showed longer lesions (23 mm vs. 19 mm) and smaller diameter of vessels (2.5 mm vs. 3.0 mm). After a median follow-up of 24 +/- 9 months, there was no significant difference in the rate of stent thrombosis (1.6% in the DES group vs. 1.2% in the BMS group, P = ns). The incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the DES group compared with the BMS group (HR 0.56 [95% CI: 0.3-0.8]; P = 0.01), principally due to the lower rate of TVR (HR 0.41 [95% CI: 0.2-0.85]; P = 0.01).ConclusionsUtilization of DES in the setting of primary PCI for STEMI, in our "real world," was safe and improved the 3-year clinical outcome compared with BMS reducing the need of TVR.2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

36 keywords...

hide…