• Doğan Bor, Türkay Toklu, Turan Olğar, Tanzer Sancak, Saruhan Cekirge, Baran Onal, and Sadik Bilgiç.
• Department of Engineering Physics, Ankara University Faculty of Engineering, 06100 Tandoğan, Ankara, Turkey. bor@eng.ankara.edu.tr
• Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 Sep 1; 29 (5): 797-806.

PurposeWe analyzed doses for various angiographic procedures using different X-ray systems in order to assess dose variations.MethodsDose-area product (DAP), skin doses from thermoluminescent dosimeters and air kerma measurements of 308 patients (239 diagnostic and 69 interventional) were assessed for five different angiographic units. All fluoroscopic and radiographic exposure parameters were recorded online for single and multiprojection studies. Radiation outputs of each X-ray system were also measured for all the modes of exposure using standard protocols for such measurements.ResultsIn general, the complexity of the angiographic procedure was found to be the most important reason for high radiation doses. Skill of the radiologist, management of the exposure parameters and calibration of the system are the other factors to be considered. Lateral cerebral interventional studies carry the highest risk for deterministic effects on the lens of the eye. Effective doses were calculated from DAP measurements and maximum fatal cancer risk factors were found for carotid studies.ConclusionsInterventional radiologists should measure patient doses for their examinations. If there is a lack of necessary instrumentation for this purpose, then published dose reports should be used in order to predict the dose levels from some of the exposure parameters. Patient dose information should include not only the measured quantity but also the measured radiation output of the X-ray unit and exposure parameters used during radiographic and fluoroscopic exposures.

10 keywords...

hide…