-
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. · Feb 2018
Comparative StudyResults of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images.
- Michael A Marchetti, Noel C F Codella, Stephen W Dusza, David A Gutman, Brian Helba, Aadi Kalloo, Nabin Mishra, Cristina Carrera, M Emre Celebi, Jennifer L DeFazio, Natalia Jaimes, Ashfaq A Marghoob, Elizabeth Quigley, Alon Scope, Oriol Yélamos, Allan C Halpern, and International Skin Imaging Collaboration.
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
- J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2018 Feb 1; 78 (2): 270-277.e1.
BackgroundComputer vision may aid in melanoma detection.ObjectiveWe sought to compare melanoma diagnostic accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists using dermoscopic images.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using 100 randomly selected dermoscopic images (50 melanomas, 44 nevi, and 6 lentigines) from an international computer vision melanoma challenge dataset (n = 379), along with individual algorithm results from 25 teams. We used 5 methods (nonlearned and machine learning) to combine individual automated predictions into "fusion" algorithms. In a companion study, 8 dermatologists classified the lesions in the 100 images as either benign or malignant.ResultsThe average sensitivity and specificity of dermatologists in classification was 82% and 59%. At 82% sensitivity, dermatologist specificity was similar to the top challenge algorithm (59% vs. 62%, P = .68) but lower than the best-performing fusion algorithm (59% vs. 76%, P = .02). Receiver operating characteristic area of the top fusion algorithm was greater than the mean receiver operating characteristic area of dermatologists (0.86 vs. 0.71, P = .001).LimitationsThe dataset lacked the full spectrum of skin lesions encountered in clinical practice, particularly banal lesions. Readers and algorithms were not provided clinical data (eg, age or lesion history/symptoms). Results obtained using our study design cannot be extrapolated to clinical practice.ConclusionDeep learning computer vision systems classified melanoma dermoscopy images with accuracy that exceeded some but not all dermatologists.Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.