• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Mar 2013

    Total arch replacement using antegrade cerebral perfusion.

    • Yutaka Okita, Kenji Okada, Atsushi Omura, Hiroya Kano, Hitoshi Minami, Takeshi Inoue, and Shunsuke Miyahara.
    • Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. yokita@med.kobe-u.ac.jp
    • J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.. 2013 Mar 1;145(3 Suppl):S63-71.

    ObjectiveThe technical details of total arch replacement using antegrade cerebral perfusion are presented.MethodsFrom January 2002 to May 2012, 423 consecutive patients (mean age, 69.2 ± 13.1 years) underwent total arch replacement using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion through a median sternotomy. Acute aortic dissection was present in 81 patients (19.1%; 75 type A, 6 type B), and a shaggy aorta was present in 37 patients (8.7%). Emergency/urgent surgery was required in 135 patients (31.9%). Our current approach included meticulous selection of the arterial cannulation site and type of arterial cannula, antegrade selective cerebral perfusion, maintenance of the minimal tympanic temperature between 20 °C and 23 °C, early rewarming immediately after distal anastomosis, and maintenance of the fluid balance at less than 1000 mL during cardiopulmonary bypass. A woven Dacron 4-branch graft was used in all patients.ResultsThe overall hospital mortality was 4.5% (19/423): 9.6% (13/135) in urgent/emergency surgery cases and 2.1% (6/288) in elective cases. Permanent neurologic deficits occurred in 3.3% patients (14/423). Prolonged ventilation was necessary in 57 patients (13.4%). A multivariate analysis demonstrated the risk factors for hospital mortality to be age (octogenarian; odds ratio, 4.45; P = .02), brain malperfusion (odds ratio, 22.5; P = .002), and cardiopulmonary bypass time (odds ratio, 1.06; P = .04). The follow-up was completed in 97.2% of patients (mean, 29 ± 27; 1-126) and included 2.3 patients per year. Survival at 5 and 10 years after surgery was 79.6% ± 3.3% and 71.2% ± 5.0%, respectively. In the acute A dissection group, the 10-year survival was 96.6% ± 2.4%. In the elective nondissection group, the 5- and 10-year survivals were 80.3% ± 4.2% and 76.1% ± 5.7%, respectively.ConclusionsOur current approach for total aortic arch replacement is associated with low hospital mortality and morbidity, thus leading to a favorable long-term outcome.Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.