• The Journal of urology · Oct 2014

    Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Reassessment of prognostic heterogeneity of pT3 renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma: analysis in terms of proposed pT3 subclassification systems.

    • Jinsung Park, Tomonori Habuchi, Youichi Arai, Chikara Ohyama, Takamitsu Inoue, Shingo Hatakeyama, Seong Soo Jeon, Ghee Young Kwon, Cheol Kwak, Kyung Chul Moon, Choung-Soo Kim, and Hanjong Ahn.
    • Department of Urology, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
    • J. Urol. 2014 Oct 1; 192 (4): 1064-71.

    PurposeWe determined whether the 3 pT3 subclassification systems reported by the Asan, Cornell and Nagoya groups provide an accurate estimation of patient prognosis. We also determined which subclassification is most predictive of the heterogeneous oncological outcomes of pT3 renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma.Materials And MethodsUsing a Korea-Japan multi-institutional, retrospective database 250 pT3 renal pelvic urothelial carcinomas treated with radical nephroureterectomy were assigned to the 3 pT3 subcategories by tumor location and depth of parenchymal invasion after pathological reevaluation. Recurrence-free and cancer specific survival was assessed according to the 3 pT3 subclassifications. Predictive accuracy for survival in 4 models (baseline and each of the 3 pT3 subclassifications) was quantified and predictive accuracy increments for each model were compared.ResultsIn the baseline multivariate Cox regression model nodal metastasis and high grade were significant for survival. On multivariate analysis including the pT3 subclassifications the 3 subclassifications remained significantly associated with survival rates. Of the 3 pT3 subclassification systems the Cornell subclassification had the highest predictive accuracy for discriminating the heterogeneous prognosis of pT3 renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma, followed by the Nagoya subclassification. Compared with the baseline model adding the Cornell subclassification significantly increased predictive accuracy for recurrence-free survival from 0.687 to 0.742 (p = 0.029) and for cancer specific survival from 0.713 to 0.758 (p = 0.047).ConclusionsThe criteria of microscopic vs macroscopic parenchymal invasion and/or peripelvic fat invasion provide the most accurate differential classification of the prognostic heterogeneity of pT3 renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma. Further studies should be performed to determine the need to modify the current pT3 renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma staging system.Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…