• Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Maged Abdel Gelil Hamed, Rania Refaat, Mohamad Zakarya AlAzzazy, Manar A Bessar, Elshaimaa Mohamed Mohamed, Ayman F Ahmed, Heba Fathy Tantawy, Khaled Mohamed Altaher, Ahmed Ali Obaya, and Amira Hamed Mohamed Afifi.
• Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. drmohammad_basha@yahoo.com.
• Jpn J Radiol. 2018 Jun 1; 36 (6): 382-393.

ObjectiveTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of WB-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting infiltration pattern, disease activity, and response to treatment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).Materials And MethodsFifty-six patients with confirmed MM were included in the present study for pre-treatment evaluation. Among these individuals, 22 patients were available for the post-treatment evaluation of response to therapy. All patients were imaged with both WB-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT. All radiographic findings of infiltration pattern, disease activity, and response to therapy were compared. The diagnostic performance of both modalities was estimated using bone marrow aspirate and biopsy as the reference test.ResultsFor detection of active myelomatous tissue at diagnosis, WB-MRI achieved higher sensitivity (94%) than 18F-FDG PET/CT (75%) (p = 0.0039), whereas both modalities achieved the same specificity (80%). For detection of residual myelomatous tissue after treatment, 18F-FDG PET/CT achieved higher specificity (86%) than WB-MRI (43%) (p = 0.0081), whereas both modalities achieved the same sensitivity (75%).ConclusionWB-MRI is more sensitive than 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of MM before treatment; however, 18F-FDG PET/CT is more specific than WB-MRI in detecting residual involvement in treated patients.

22 keywords...

hide…