• Eur J Radiol · Feb 2016

    Comparative Study

    Comparison between whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging and PET/CT in staging newly diagnosed FDG-avid lymphomas.

    • Domenico Albano, Caterina Patti, Ludovico La Grutta, Francesco Agnello, Emanuele Grassedonio, Antonino Mulè, Giorgio Cannizzaro, Umberto Ficola, Roberto Lagalla, Massimo Midiri, and Massimo Galia.
    • Department of Radiology, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, Palermo 90127, Italy. Electronic address: albanodomenico@me.com.
    • Eur J Radiol. 2016 Feb 1; 85 (2): 313-8.

    ObjectivesTo compare whole body-MRI (WB-MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging and FDG-PET/CT in staging newly diagnosed FDG-avid lymphomas.Methods68 patients (37 males, 31 females; median age 42 years; range 15-86 years) with histologically confirmed lymphoma (37 Classical Hodgkin, 16 Diffuse large B-cell, 10 Follicular, 5 Mantle cell) underwent both MRI and FDG-PET/CT before treatment. Ann Arbor stages obtained with WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT were compared using Cohen's k statistics. Moreover WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT stages were compared with the pathological stages obtained after the diagnostic iter using also bone marrow and available biopsies if clinically indicated.ResultsThe agreement between WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT was excellent. WB-MRI stage was equal to those of FDG-PET/CT in 62/68 patients (91.2%). There was an excellent agreement between WB-MRI stage and pathological stage (63/68 patients; 92.6%), and between FDG-PET/CT and pathological stage (64/68 patients; 94.1%). The differences between the stages were more frequent in the patients with Mantle cell lymphoma.ConclusionsWB-MRI can be considered as a promising technique for FDG-avid lymphoma staging.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.