• Am J Emerg Med · Mar 1996

    The relationship between National Resident Match Program rank and perceived performance in an emergency medicine residency.

    • D P Sklar and D Tandberg.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque 87131-5246, USA.
    • Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Mar 1; 14 (2): 170-2.

    AbstractA nonconcurrent prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate if National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) rank developed using multivariate regression followed by consensus group activity is associated with perceived general performance during emergency medicine residency. All residents graduating from a university hospital-based residency program between 1990 to 1993 were ranked by university faculty, private attendings, charge nurses, and a clerk. Each evaluator was asked to order (from the strongest to the weakest) a deck of cards that contained only each graduate's name and picture. NRMP ranks were scaled to adjust for differences in each year's match list length. Evaluators were unaware of the graduates NRMP ranks. Agreement among raters was analyzed using Kendall's coefficient of concordance. Perceived ranks were compared with actual NRMP ranks using the Spearman correlation procedure. Twenty graduates were evaluated by eight different individuals, yielding 160 pairs of ranks. There was moderately strong agreement among evaluators about the relative strength of the 20 residents (W = 0.67, P < .001). The association of perceived rank with NRMP rank was much greater than that expected by chance (r(s) = .35, P < .0001). Applicants with better NRMP ranks were perceived as stronger residents, which supports the strategy of using formal statistical modelling followed by consensus group activity as a method of generating NRMP rank lists.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…