• Surg Technol Int · Jun 2018

    Biological Intercalary Reconstruction with Bone Grafts After Joint-Sparing Resection of the Lower Limb: Is this an Effective and Durable Solution for Joint Preservation?

    • Francesco Muratori, Francesca Totti, Antonio D'Arienzo, Maurizio Scorianz, Guido Scoccianti, Giovanni Beltrami, Francesco Rosario Campo, Carmine Citarelli, Rodolfo Capanna, and Domenico Andrea Campanacci.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
    • Surg Technol Int. 2018 Jun 1; 32: 346-345.

    AbstractDue to advances in neoadjuvant therapies and preoperative imaging modalities, joint-sparing resections have become appealing in bone tumor surgery. However, the intercalary reconstruction of metadiaphyseal bone defects of the femur and the tibia after juxta-articular tumor resection remains challenging. Both biological and prosthetic reconstructions have been used for joint-sparing resections, but little is known about the long-term outcome of these procedures. The authors reviewed a consecutive series of 64 patients treated with joint-sparing intercalary resection and reconstruction with bone grafts. Inclusion criteria were an osteotomy line within 5 cm from the knee and ankle joint surface and an osteotomy line proximal to 1 cm below the lesser trochanter at the hip level. Intra-epiphyseal resection was performed in 25 patients (39%)and intercalary resection was performed in 39 (61%). Reconstruction included 49 allograft + vascularized fibular graft (VFG), 10 allografts, and 5 VFG + structural allogenic grafts. At a mean follow-up of 117 months (range 12-305), 51 patients (80%) were continuously disease-free, and 6 showed no evidence of disease after treatment of local recurrence or metastatic lesion. One patient was alive with lung metastases at 26 months of follow-up and six patients died of disease. In the entire series of 64 patients, 26 had a non-oncological complication that required surgical revision (40.6%). Overall survival (OS) of reconstruction was 92% at 5 years and 90% at 10 and 15 years. Limb salvage survival (LSS) was 94% at 5, 10 and 15 years. Twenty-two fractures occurred in 17 patients (26.5%). There were a total of nine non-unions (14%). Six patients (9.3%) presented early wound dehiscence (average 1.8 months, range 0-6). A deep infection occurred in 3 cases (4.7 %). In 12 patients treated with VGF reconstruction (12/54:22%), a donor-site complication was observed. The overall Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional score in 54 evaluable patients, who were alive with reconstruction in situ, was 27 points (range 18-30). Biologic intercalary reconstructions with bone grafts resulted in effective joint-sparing resections of the lower limb, allowing joint preservation in all but one case who required a total knee replacement for varus osteoarthritis. Despite the high rate of complications requiring surgical revision, at 15 years, overall survival of the reconstruction was 90% and limb salvage survival was 94%. In our experience, revision-free survival was better with VFG reconstruction than with allograft alone and the combination of VFG and allogenic graft seems to favor spontaneous fracture-healing and to decrease the non-union rate.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.