• Hosam E Matar, Benjamin V Bloch, Susan E Snape, and Peter J James.
• Nottingham Elective Orthopaedic Services, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
• J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun 1; 36 (6): 2131-2136.

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to examine the differences in long-term mortality rates between septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) in a single specialist center over 17-year period.MethodsRetrospective consecutive study of all patients who underwent rTKA at our tertiary center between 2003 and 2019 was carried out. Revisions were classified as septic or aseptic. We identified patients' age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and body mass index. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at 5 years, 10 years, and over the whole study period of 17 years. Death was identified through both local hospital electronic databases and linked data from the National Joint Registry/NHS Personal Demographic Service. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate time to death.ResultsIn total, 1298 consecutive knee revisions were performed on 1254 patients (44 bilateral revisions) with 985 aseptic revisions in 945 patients (75.4%) and 313 septic revisions in 309 patients (24.6%). Average age was 70.6 years (range 27-95) with 720 females (57.4%). Septic revisions had higher mortality rates; patients' survivorship for septic vs aseptic revisions was 77.6% vs 89.5% at 5 years, 68.7% vs 80.2% at 10 years, and 66.1% vs 75.0% at 17 years; these differences were all statistically significant (P < .0001). The unadjusted 10-year risk ratio of death after septic revision was 1.59 (95% confidence interval 1.29-1.96) compared to aseptic revisions.ConclusionrTKA performed for infection is associated with significantly higher long-term mortality at all time points compared with aseptic revision surgery.Level Of EvidenceLevel IV.Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

18 keywords...

hide…