• Eur J Radiol · Apr 2016

    Comparative Study

    PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer.

    • Jun Xin, Quanmei Ma, Qiyong Guo, Hongzan Sun, Shaomin Zhang, Changping Liu, and Wei Zhai.
    • Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, PR China. Electronic address: xinjun69@189.cn.
    • Eur J Radiol. 2016 Apr 1; 85 (4): 751-9.

    ObjectiveIntegrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) scanners provide combined MR-based anatomic and metabolic image information. The aim of this study was to evaluate qualitative and quantitative diagnostic performance of PET/MR with (18)fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) using a diagnostic MR sequence in patients with abdominal and pelvic tumors, compared to positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).Materials And MethodsForty five patients underwent a single-injection ((18)F-FDG), dual-imaging protocol including whole-body PET/CT and subsequent regional PET/MR hybrid imaging. A regional PET/MR scan followed the PET/CT. Images from both modalities were analyzed using a 3-point scale for PET/CT and PET/MR image quality, image alignment, and lesion visibility on PET images. PET-CT/PET-MR functional and anatomical correlation was analyzed.ResultsA total of 66 lesions were studied, from which 63 were identified using PET/CT and 59 were identified using PET/MR. The (18)F-FDG PET images had good diagnostic quality (P<0.001); alignment was found to be excellent in PET/MR data as well as PET/CT data (P=0.102), and there was no difference in lesion visibility (P=0.18). The average rating score regarding anatomical correlation for PET-positive lesions was 2.75 for combined MR sequence images and 2.04 for CT, with a significant difference (P=0.317), Standard uptake value (SUV) for focal lesions had excellent correlation (SUVmax/mean: R=0.948/0.948); furthermore, the SUVmean of background organs combined, bone marrow and the muscle tissue showed good correlation (R=0.329/0.398/0.298). No correlations were found in the liver and spleen.ConclusionsPET/MR with diagnostic MR sequence was able to detect abdominal and pelvic lesions and had good image quality compared to PET/CT. SUVmax and SUVmean values in focal lesions, and the SUVmean of background organs generally correlated well in abdominal and pelvic oncology patients examined using PET/CT and PET/MRI.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…