• I Todt, R Guerkov, H B Gehl, and H Sudhoff.
• Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bielefeld University, Campus Mitte, Bielefeld, Germany.
• Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jan 1; 2020: 5086291.

IntroductionRecent developments regarding cochlear implant magnets (e.g., a bipolar diametral magnet) and refined surgical techniques (e.g., implant positioning) have had a significant impact on the relation between cochlear implants and MRIs, making the reproducible visibility of cochlea and IAC possible. MRI scanning has changed from a contraindication to a diagnostic tool. Magnet artifact size plays a central role in the visual assessment of the cochlea and IAC.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to compare the CI magnet-related maximum artifact sizes of various cochlea implant systems.Materials And MethodsWe performed an in vivo measurement of MRI artifacts at 1.5 and 3 Tesla with three cochlear implant magnet systems (AB 3D, Medel Synchrony, and Oticon ZTI). The implant, including the magnet, was positioned with a head bandage 7.0 cm and 120° from the nasion, external auditory canal. We used a TSE T2w MRI sequence on the axial and coronal plains and compared the artifacts in two volunteers for each tesla strength.ResultsIntraindividual artifact size differences between the three magnets are smaller than interindividual maximum artifact size differences. 3 T MRI scans, in comparison to 1.5 T MRI scans, show a difference between soft artifact areas.ConclusionWe observed no major difference between maximum implant magnet artifact sizes of the three implant magnet types.Copyright © 2020 I. Todt et al.

9 keywords...

hide…