• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Aug 2012

    Comparative Study

    Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is more diagnostic than 2-dimensional echocardiography in determining the presence of bicuspid aortic valve.

    • S Chris Malaisrie, James Carr, Issam Mikati, Vera Rigolin, Byron K Yip, Brittany Lapin, and Patrick M McCarthy.
    • Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL 60614, USA. cmalaisr@nmh.org
    • J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.. 2012 Aug 1;144(2):370-6.

    ObjectiveThis study compares 2-dimensional, transthoracic echocardiography with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative identification of bicuspid aortic valve before aortic valve surgery.MethodsOf 1203 patients who underwent an aortic valve operation, 218 had both preoperative transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Patients in the study group were aged 56 years and had an ejection fraction of 56%, 76% were male, and 29% had associated coronary artery disease. The results of transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were classified as bicuspid aortic valve, trileaflet aortic valve, or nondiagnostic. Of the 218 patients, 123 (56%) had bicuspid aortic valve as determined at the time of surgery and 116 (53%) had an ascending aortic aneurysm.ResultsOf the 123 patients with bicuspid aortic valve confirmed at surgery, by transthoracic echocardiography 76 (62%) were identified preoperatively with bicuspid aortic valve, 12 (10%) were misidentified with trileaflet aortic valve, and 35 (28%) were nondiagnostic for valve morphology. In the same patients with bicuspid aortic valve, by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 115 (93%) were identified with bicuspid aortic valve, 5 (4%) were misidentified with trileaflet aortic valve, and 3 (2%) were nondiagnostic. The difference between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to determine the presence of bicuspid aortic valve was statistically significant (P<.001). In the entire cohort of patients, transthoracic echocardiography was diagnostic for valve morphology in 155 patients (71%) compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, which was diagnostic in 212 patients (97%) (P<.001).ConclusionsCardiac magnetic resonance imaging is more diagnostic than transthoracic echocardiography in determining the presence of bicuspid aortic valve. A significant factor is the rate of nondiagnostic transthoracic echocardiography for aortic valve morphology. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can be performed as a complementary test when transthoracic echocardiography is nondiagnostic for aortic valve morphology.Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.