• Bmc Health Serv Res · Aug 2015

    Outcome of a reproductive health advocacy mentoring intervention for staff of selected non-governmental organisations in Nigeria.

    • Gloria T Momoh, Mojisola M Oluwasanu, Olufemi L Oduola, Grace E Delano, and Oladapo A Ladipo.
    • Association for Reproductive & Family Health, Qtr 815A, Army Officers Mess Road, Ikolaba, P.O. Box 30259 Secretariat Post Office, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. gloriamomoh@yahoo.com.
    • Bmc Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 11; 15: 314.

    BackgroundNon-governmental organisations (NGOs) are expected to be in the vanguard, repositioning reproductive health as a central issue in population and development in Nigeria. However, most of them have insufficient knowledge or access to policy and planning processes necessary at engaging effectively with the government. This article highlights the processes and outcome of an intervention aimed at strengthening the capacity of 12 non-governmental organisations on advocacy and policy related activities with emphasis on reproductive health issues.MethodsThe study employed a one group, pre and post test study design. Thirty six (36) staff from 12 NGOs was purposively selected and interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire at baseline to assess their knowledge and level of involvement in reproductive health, advocacy and policy issues. In-depth interviews were conducted with 6 officials of the ministries of health and women affairs to document previous reproductive health and policy related collaborative efforts with the NGOs. Baseline findings were used in developing and implementing a capacity building intervention. A post intervention evaluation was conducted to assess the outcomes.ResultsAll respondents (100%) had tertiary level education and were from a multidisciplinary background such as nursing (41.7%) medicine (25%) and administration (13.9%). The mean knowledge score on advocacy and policy issues at pre-test and post test was 39.1 ± 17.6 and 76.2 ± 14.2 respectively (p = 0.00). Participants reported making use of advocacy methods and the three most utilized were Phone calls (28.1%), Face to Face meetings (26%) and networking with other organisations for stronger impact (17.1%). The outcome of their advocacy efforts include the provision of free air time by a television station to educate the populace on maternal health issues, donation of landed property to build a youth friendly centre, donation of a blog site for disseminating information on Reproductive health issues and training of other staff of their organisations on advocacy activities. The major challenges experienced by staff of the NGOs were financial (89%) and time constraints (11%).ConclusionEmpowered non-governmental organisations can effectively advocate for the implementation of reproductive health policies and programmes.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…