• Spine J · Jun 2018

    Long-term clinical results following Charite III lumbar total disc replacement.

    • Shibao Lu, Siyuan Sun, Chao Kong, Wenzhi Sun, Hailiang Hu, Qingyi Wang, and Yong Hai.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Capital Medical University Xuanwu Hospital, No. 45 Changchun St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China. Electronic address: spinelu@163.com.
    • Spine J. 2018 Jun 1; 18 (6): 917-925.

    Background ContextLumbar total disc replacement (TDR) operation represents an alternative to lumbar fusion for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration and has gained increasing attention in recent years.PurposeThis study aimed to assess clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients with TDR and the long-term survival rate of the prostheses.Study DesignThis is a retrospective, single-center clinical study.Patient SampleThe sample comprised 30 patients, giving a total of 35 prostheses after an average follow-up (FU) of 15.2 years following TDR, which was performed for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.Outcome MeasuresClinical evaluation included visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological parameters of intervertebral disc height (IDH), range of motion (ROM), lumbar lordosis, lumbar scoliosis, and prosthesis position were evaluated in surgical and adjacent levels. Complications and re-operation rates were also assessed.MethodsClinical evaluation and radiological parameters were evaluated preoperatively and at final FU. All data were collected by members of our department, including research assistants and nurses who were not involved in the decision making of this study.ResultsThirty of the 35 patients participated in the final FU. The cumulative survival rate of the prosthesis at a mean FU of 15.4 years was 100%. The clinical success rate was 93.3%. The VAS and ODI scores at final FU were significantly lower than preoperatively (p<.001). The average ROM of the operated and superior adjacent segment decreased significantly at the final FU, whereas the inferior adjacent segment was not affected. The IDH of all surgical and adjacent levels were well maintained at the final FU. Ten patients had a lumbar scoliosis >3° and the mean angle was 8.5°, of which 7 had left convex curvature. Three prostheses were offset more than 5 mm from the midline on the coronal plane. Four prostheses showed subsidence. Twenty-six operative segments and five adjacent segments showed heterotopic ossification. Two patients of the total 35-patient cohort underwent a secondary operation.ConclusionsSatisfactory clinical results and good prosthesis survival can be achieved in the long term. Lumbar TDR surgeries also have the potential to reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease.Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…