• Mona L McPherson, Larry S Jefferson, E O'Brian Smith, Garry C Sitler, and Jeanine M Graf.
• Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
• Air Med. J. 2007 Jul 1; 26 (4): 183-7.

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiology and resources used and to study the potential savings of pediatric reverse transport patients.MethodsA case control study was performed with patients undergoing a reverse or outbound transport from a large, pediatric hospital. Twenty-five children undergoing reverse transport were compared with matched controls. Lengths of stay and costs were compared between the reverse transport and matched control patients.ResultsFifty-two percent of the reverse transport patients returned home, whereas 32% went home for end-of-life care and 16% went to other facilities. The average reverse transport was more than 400 miles and cost $6,064. The reverse transport of these patients did not save pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) days but did result in a shorter hospital stay compared with the matched controls (10 vs. 19 days, P = .03). Decreased utilization of bed days came from less use of intermediate care unit resources.ConclusionsPediatric patients undergo reverse transports for a variety of reasons, often for end-of-life care. The ability to reverse transport pediatric patients may not save PICU bed days but may offer pediatric tertiary care hospitals a means to provide more intermediate care bed availability.

13 keywords...

hide…