-
Observational Study
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for detecting large-vessel giant cell arteritis using FDG PET/CT as the reference.
- Berit Dalsgaard Nielsen, Ib Tønder Hansen, Kresten Krarup Keller, Philip Therkildsen, Lars Christian Gormsen, and Ellen-Margrethe Hauge.
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.
- Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Aug 1; 59 (8): 2062-2073.
ObjectivesThe diagnostic accuracy of axillary artery US in the diagnosis of large-vessel (LV)-GCA using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT as reference standard was prospectively evaluated in GCA-suspected patients. As an exploratory analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of cranial artery FDG PET/CT was evaluated.MethodsBriefly, the inclusion criteria were age ≥50 years, raised inflammatory markers and potential GCA symptoms. Patients in immunosuppressive therapy or with a previous diagnosis of GCA or PMR were excluded. Examinations were performed pre-treatment. LV-GCA reference diagnosis was a clinical diagnosis of GCA and PET-proven LV inflammation. GCA patients fulfilling ACR criteria were considered as cranial-GCA (c-GCA). Patients without GCA were considered controls. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the US-measured axillary intima-media thickness was performed. FDG uptake in temporal, maxillary and vertebral arteries was also assessed.ResultsForty-six patients were diagnosed with LV-GCA, 10 with isolated c-GCA, and in 34 patients GCA was dismissed. Axillary US yielded a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 100% for LV-GCA. An axillary intima-media thickness cut-off of 1.0 mm yielded a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 92%. Adding LV US to temporal assessment increased sensitivity from 71% to 97% (all GCA patients). Cranial artery PET showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 100% for c-GCA.ConclusionAxillary artery US shows high accuracy for the LV-GCA diagnosis. Building upon the recent EULAR recommendations, we propose a diagnostic algorithm with US as the first-line confirmatory test, not only in c-GCA-suspected patients, but in all patients suspected of GCA.© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.