• Int. J. Clin. Pract. · Oct 2021

    Prevalence and cost of surgical treatment for female stress urinary incontinence in Brazil: a comparison between abdominal and vaginal approaches.

    • Maria Claudia Bicudo, Antônio Flávio Rodrigues, Yasser Omar Dalle, André Luiz Farinhas Tomé, Felipe Placco Araujo Glina, and Sidney Glina.
    • Urology Division, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC do Centro Universitário de Saúde ABC, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
    • Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021 Oct 1; 75 (10): e14527.

    ObjectiveReport the progress of the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in Brazil through vaginal and abdominal approaches and the direct costs by hospitalisation, using DATASUS-a public entity of the Strategic and Participative Management Secretary of Health Ministry, with the responsibility of collecting, processing, and disseminating public health information.DesignEpidemiological study using the Brazilian Public Health Data Center System (DATASUS).Participants/Materials, Setting, And MethodsData were collected on all hospital admissions associated with treatment from 2008 to 2019 from the DATASUS. We analysed the records of hospitalisations associated with an abdominal or vaginal surgical SUI treatment.ResultsThe total number of procedures for the treatment of female SUI performed from 2008 to 2019 was 84.378, of which 70 238 were vaginal and 14 140 abdominal. There was an overall decrease in the number of SUI procedures in Brazil over the years analysed (F = 52.72; P < .0001); only exception was the South region (F = 1.38; P = .267). A declining trend was identified for the abdominal approach, with an increased trend of the vaginal approach (F = 170.11; P < .0001). A declining number of hospitalisation days was noted in the vaginal procedures (P = .002). Despite the fact that no differences were noted between abdominal and vaginal expenses (P = .054), hospital expenditure increased over the years for both vaginal and abdominal approaches, with no significant differences between either approaches. However, a statistically significant professional expenditure was observed in the abdominal approach (P < .001). Analysing hospitalisation and professional expenses, the total mean in the period was statistically higher for the abdominal approach (P < .0001).ConclusionsThe number of procedures to treat female SUI in Brazil has decreased from 2008 to 2019. Total financial expenditure per procedure and length of hospital stay were both higher for the abdominal approach (Burch colposuspension). A preference for a vaginal approach (pubovaginal sling or midurethral sling) has increased significantly since 2008, and our study favours this approach.© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.