• Pulm Pharmacol Ther · Oct 2011

    Multicenter Study

    Reevaluation of the efficacy and safety of the neutrophil elastase inhibitor, Sivelestat, for the treatment of acute lung injury associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome; a phase IV study.

    • Naoki Aikawa, Akitoshi Ishizaka, Hiroyuki Hirasawa, Shuji Shimazaki, Yasuhiro Yamamoto, Hisashi Sugimoto, Masahiro Shinozaki, Nobuyuki Taenaka, Shigeatsu Endo, Toshiaki Ikeda, and Yasushi Kawasaki.
    • Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinano-machi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan. aikawa7@rc4.so-net.ne.jp
    • Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Oct 1; 24 (5): 549-54.

    IntroductionSivelestat, a neutrophil elastase inhibitor, has been approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with acute lung injury (ALI) associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) has ordered to conduct a postmarket clinical study in order to reevaluate the efficacy and safety of Sivelestat in actual clinical settings in Japan.MethodsAccording to the PMDA's order, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of Sivelestat in Japanese patients with ALI associated with SIRS using ventilator-free days (VFD) as the primary endpoint. The surrogate endpoints are ventilator-weaning rate, ICU discharge rate, and 180-day survival rate. Study design was an open-label, non-randomized, multi-center clinical trial. Sivelestat was intravenously administered at 0.2 mg/kg/h continuously for a maximum of 14 days. Sivelestat group and control group were compared by adjusting the outcome values using an inverse probability of treatment weighted method based on the propensity scores.ResultsFour hundred and four Sivelestat group patients and 177 control group patients were enrolled. The adjusted mean number of VFD was 15.7 and 12.1 in the Sivelestat group and control group, respectively (P = 0.0022). Both the adjusted ventilator-weaning rate and ICU discharge rate were significantly higher in the Sivelestat group than in the control group (P = 0.0028 and P = 0.019, respectively). The adjusted 180-day survival rate was significantly higher in the Sivelestat group than in the control group (71.8 percent vs. 56.3 percent).ConclusionsSivelestat contributed to early weaning from the mechanical ventilation, while showing no negative effect on the long-term outcomes of ALI associated with SIRS. The results of this study suggest the clinical usefulness of Sivelestat in this patient population.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.