• Helen P French, Tara Cusack, Aisling Brennan, Aoife Caffrey, Ronán Conroy, Vanessa Cuddy, Oliver M FitzGerald, Martina Fitzpatrick, Clare Gilsenan, David Kane, Paul G O'Connell, Breon White, and Geraldine M McCarthy.
• School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. hfrench@rcsi.ie
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Feb 1; 94 (2): 302-14.

ObjectivesTo determine the effectiveness of exercise therapy (ET) compared with ET with adjunctive manual therapy (MT) for people with hip osteoarthritis (OA); and to identify if immediate commencement of treatment (ET or ET+MT) was more beneficial than a 9-week waiting period for either intervention.DesignAssessor-blind randomized controlled trial with a 9-week and 18-week follow-up.SettingFour academic teaching hospitals in Dublin, Ireland.ParticipantsPatients (N=131) with hip OA recruited from general practitioners, rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and other hospital consultants were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: ET (n=45), ET+MT (n=43), and waitlist controls (n=43).InterventionsParticipants in both the ET and ET+MT groups received up to 8 treatments over 8 weeks. Control group participants were rerandomized into either ET or ET+MT groups after 9 week follow-up. Their data were pooled with original treatment group data: ET (n=66) and ET+MT (n=65).Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function (PF) subscale. Secondary outcomes included physical performance, pain severity, hip range of motion (ROM), anxiety/depression, quality of life, medication usage, patient-perceived change, and patient satisfaction.ResultsThere was no significant difference in WOMAC PF between the ET (n=66) and ET+MT (n=65) groups at 9 weeks (mean difference, .09; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.93 to 3.11) or 18 weeks (mean difference, .42; 95% CI, -4.41 to 5.25), or between other outcomes, except patient satisfaction with outcomes, which was higher in the ET+MT group (P=.02). Improvements in WOMAC, hip ROM, and patient-perceived change occurred in both treatment groups compared with the control group.ConclusionsSelf-reported function, hip ROM, and patient-perceived improvement occurred after an 8-week program of ET for patients with OA of the hip. MT as an adjunct to exercise provided no further benefit, except for higher patient satisfaction with outcome.Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…