• Lancet · Apr 2015

    Neonatal surgery in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of challenges of management and outcome.

    • Sebastian O Ekenze, Obinna V Ajuzieogu, and Benedict C Nwomeh.
    • Sub-Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. Electronic address: sebekenze@gmail.com.
    • Lancet. 2015 Apr 27;385 Suppl 2:S35.

    BackgroundAdvances in diagnostic techniques and perioperative care have greatly improved the outcome of neonatal surgery. Despite this, disparity still exists in the outcome of neonatal surgery between high-income countries and low-income and middle-income countries. This study reviews publications on neonatal surgery in Africa over 20 years with a focus on challenges of management, trends in outcome, and potential interventions to improve outcome.MethodsWe did a literature review by searching PubMed and African Index Medicus for original articles published in any language between January, 1995, and September, 2014, with the search terms "neonatal surgery" and "Africa", further supplemented by "(surgery OR anaesthesia) AND (neonatal OR newborn) AND (developing countries OR Africa)". A data extraction sheet was used to collect information, including type of study, demographics, number of cases, outcome, challenges, and suggestions to improve outcome. For the meta-analysis, data were analysed by χ(2) test or Student's t-test as appropriate. In all, the significance level was set to p<0·05.FindingsWe identified 859 published papers, of which 51 studies from 11 countries met the inclusion criteria. The 16 studies in the first 10 years (before 2005; group A) were compared with the 35 in the last 10 years (2005-14; group B). Nigeria (n=32; 62·7%), South Africa (n=7; 13·7%), Tanzania (n=2; 3·9%), and Tunisia (n=2; 3·9%) were the predominant source of the publications, of which were retrospective in 38 (74·5%) studies and prospective in 13 (25·5%) studies. The mean sample size of the studies was 97·8 (range 5-640). Overall, 4989 neonates were studied, with median age of 6 days (range 1-30). Common neonatal conditions reported were intestinal atresia in 28 (54·9%) studies, abdominal wall defects in 27 (52·9%), anorectal malformations in 24 (47·1%), and Hirschsprung's disease, necrotising enterocolitis, and volvulus neonatorum in 23 (45·1%) each. Mortality was lowest (<3%) in spina bifida and facial cleft procedures, and highest (>50%) in emergency neonatal surgeries involving bowel perforation, bowel resection, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, oesophageal atresia, and ruptured omphalocele or gastroschisis. Overall average mortality rate was higher in group A than in group B (36·9% vs 29·1%; p<0·001), but mortality did not vary between the groups for similar neonatal conditions. The major documented challenges were delayed presentation and inadequate facilities in 39 (76·5%) studies, dearth of trained support personnel in 32 (62·7%), and absence of neonatal intensive care in 29 (56·9%). The challenges varied from country to country but did not differ in the two groups.InterpretationImprovement has been achieved in outcomes of neonatal surgery in Africa in the past two decades, although several of the studies reviewed are retrospective and poorly designed. Cost-effective adaptations for neonatal intensive care, improved health-care funding, coordinated neonatal surgical care via regional centres, and collaboration with international partners are potential interventions that could help to address the challenges and further improve outcome.FundingNone.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.