• J Magn Reson Imaging · Feb 2009

    Comparative Study

    Added value of breathhold diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma lesions compared with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

    • Peng-Ju Xu, Fu-Hua Yan, Jian-Hua Wang, Jiang Lin, and Yuan Ji.
    • Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Feb 1; 29 (2): 341-9.

    PurposeTo evaluate the added value of single-breathhold diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions (< or =2 cm) in patients with chronic liver disease, by comparing the detection sensitivity of combined DWI/conventional dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI to that of conventional DCE-MRI alone.Materials And MethodsA total of 37 patients with chronic liver diseases underwent abdominal MRI at 1.5T, including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and 2D conventional DCE. For each patient study, axial DWI was performed with a single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence using a modified sensitivity-encoding (mSENSE) technique with b-value of 500 seconds/mm(2). A total of 20-24 slices were obtained during a 15-17-second breathhold. Two observers independently interpreted the combined DWI/conventional DCE-MRI images and the conventional DCE-MRI images alone in random order. For all small HCC lesions, the diagnostic performance using each imaging set was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were also calculated and analyzed.ResultsA total of 47 small HCCs were confirmed as final result. The area under the ROC curve (Az) of combined DWI/conventional DCE-MRI images (observer 1, 0.922; observer 2, 0.918) were statistically higher than those of conventional DCE-MRI alone (observer 1, 0.809; observer 2, 0.778) for all small HCC lesions (P < 0.01). The lesion detection sensitivities using the combined technique for both observers were significantly higher than those using conventional DCE-MRI alone (P < 0.01). The sensitivity values for two observers using the combined technique were 97.87% and those using conventional DCE-MRI alone were 85.11% to 82.98%. The positive predictive values for two observers using the combined imaging technique (97.87%) were slightly higher than those using conventional DCE-MRI alone (92.86-93.02%), but there was no significant difference between the two imaging sets.ConclusionCombined use of breathhold DWI with conventional DCE-MRI helped to provide higher sensitivities than conventional DCE-MRI alone in the detection of small HCC lesions in patients with chronic liver disease.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.