• J Psychiatr Res · Oct 2016

    Testing different paradigms to optimize antidepressant deep brain stimulation in different rat models of depression.

    • Julia Rummel, Mareike Voget, Ravit Hadar, Samuel Ewing, Reinhard Sohr, Julia Klein, Alexander Sartorius, Andreas Heinz, Aleksander A Mathé, Barbara Vollmayr, and Christine Winter.
    • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany; International Graduate Program Medical Neurosciences, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
    • J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Oct 1; 81: 36-45.

    AbstractDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of several targets induces beneficial responses in approximately 60% of patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The remaining 40% indicate that these stimulation sites do not bear therapeutic relevance for all TRD patients and consequently DBS-targets should be selected according to individual symptom profiles. We here used two animal models of depression known to have different genetic backgrounds and behavioral responses: the therapy-responsive Flinders sensitive line (FSL) and the therapy-refractory congenitally learned helpless rats (cLH) to study symptom-specific DBS effects i) of different brain sites ii) at different stimulation parameters, and iii) at different expressions of the disease. Sham-stimulation/DBS was applied chronic-intermittently or chronic-continuously to either the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC, rodent equivalent to subgenual cingulate), nucleus accumbens (Nacc) or subthalamic nucleus (STN), and effects were studied on different depression-associated behaviors, i.e. anhedonia, immobility/behavioral despair and learned helplessness. Biochemical substrates of behaviorally effective versus ineffective DBS were analyzed using in-vivo microdialysis and post-mortem high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). We found that i) vmPFC-DBS outperforms Nacc-DBS, ii) STN-DBS increases depressive states, iii) chronic-continuous DBS does not add benefits compared to chronic-intermittent DBS, iv) DBS-efficacy depends on the disease expression modeled and iv) antidepressant DBS is associated with an increase in serotonin turnover alongside site-specific reductions in serotonin contents. The reported limited effectiveness of vmPFC DBS suggests that future research may consider the specific disease expression, investigation of different DBS-targets and alternative parameter settings.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.