• J Magn Reson Imaging · Jun 2021

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Prediction of the Histopathological Grade of Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Two-Center Study.

    • Ruixin Yan, Dapeng Hao, Jie Li, Jihua Liu, Feng Hou, Haisong Chen, Lisha Duan, Chencui Huang, Hexiang Wang, and Tengbo Yu.
    • Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266003, China.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jun 1; 53 (6): 1683-1696.

    BackgroundPreoperative prediction of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) grade is important for treatment decisions. Therefore, formulation an STS grade model is strongly needed.PurposeTo develop and test an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics nomogram for predicting the grade of STS (low-grade vs. high grade).Study TypeRetrospective POPULATION: One hundred and eighty patients with STS confirmed by pathologic results at two independent institutions were enrolled (training set, N = 109; external validation set, N = 71).Field Strength/SequenceUnenhanced T1-weighted (T1WI) and fat-suppressed T2-weighted images (FS-T2WI) were acquired at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.AssessmentClinical-MRI characteristics included age, gender, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, progression-free survival (PFS), and MRI morphological features (ie, margin). Radiomics feature extraction were performed on T1WI and FS-T2WI images by minimum redundancy maximum relevance (MRMR) method and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. The selected features constructed three radiomics signatures models (RS-T1, RS-FST2, and RS-Combined). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were applied for screening significant risk factors. Radiomics nomogram was constructed by incorporating the radiomics signature and risk factors.Statistical TestsClinical-MRI characteristics were performed by a univariate analysis. Model performances (discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness) were validated in the external validation set. The RS-T1 model, RS-FST2 model, and RS-Combined model had an area under curves (AUCs) of 0.645, 0.641, and 0.829, respectively, in the external validation set. The radiomics nomogram, incorporating significant risk factors and the RS-Combined model had AUCs of 0.916 (95%CI, 0.866-0.966, training set) and 0.879 (95%CI, 0.791-0.967, external validation set), and demonstrated good calibration and good clinical utility.Data ConclusionThe proposed noninvasive MRI-based radiomics models showed good performance in differentiating low-grade from high-grade STSs.Level Of Evidence3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.