• Am J Prev Med · Jan 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Daily self-weighing and adverse psychological outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

    • Dori M Steinberg, Deborah F Tate, Gary G Bennett, Susan Ennett, Carmen Samuel-Hodge, and Dianne S Ward.
    • Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Duke Obesity Prevention Program, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, North Carolina. Electronic address: dori.steinberg@duke.edu.
    • Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan 1; 46 (1): 24-9.

    BackgroundDespite evidence that daily self-weighing is an effective strategy for weight control, concerns remain regarding the potential for negative psychological consequences.PurposeThe goal of the study was to examine the impact of a daily self-weighing weight-loss intervention on relevant psychological constructs.DesignA 6-month RCT.Setting/ParticipantsThe study sample (N=91) included overweight men and women in the Chapel Hill NC area.InterventionBetween February and August 2011, participants were randomly assigned to a daily self-weighing intervention or delayed-intervention control group. The 6-month intervention included daily self-weighing for self-regulation of diet and exercise behaviors using an e-scale that transmitted weights to a study website. Weekly e-mailed lessons and tailored feedback on daily self-weighing adherence and weight-loss progress were provided.Main Outcome MeasuresSelf-weighing frequency was measured throughout the study using e-scales. Weight was measured in-clinic at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Psychological outcomes were assessed via self-report at the same time points.ResultsIn 2012, using linear mixed models and generalized estimating equation models, there were no significant differences between groups in depressive symptoms, anorectic cognitions, disinhibition, susceptibility to hunger, and binge eating. At 6 months, there was a significant group X time interaction for body dissatisfaction (p=0.007) and dietary restraint (p<0.001), with the intervention group reporting lower body dissatisfaction and greater dietary restraint compared to controls.ConclusionsResults indicate that a weight-loss intervention that focuses on daily self-weighing does not cause adverse psychological outcomes. This suggests that daily self-weighing is an effective and safe weight-control strategy among overweight adults attempting to lose weight.Trial RegistrationThis study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01369004.Copyright © 2014 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.