• J Magn Reson Imaging · Aug 2018

    Using support vector machine analysis to assess PartinMR: A new prediction model for organ-confined prostate cancer.

    • Jing Wang, Chen-Jiang Wu, Mei-Ling Bao, Jing Zhang, Hai-Bin Shi, and Yu-Dong Zhang.
    • Center for Medical Device Evaluation, CFDA, Beijing, China.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Aug 1; 48 (2): 499-506.

    BackgroundPartin tables represent the most widely used predictive tool for prostate cancer stage at prostatectomy but with potential limitations.PurposeTo develop a new PartinMR model for organ-confined prostate cancer (OCPCA) by incorporating Partin table and mp-MRI with a support vector machine (SVM) analysis.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationIn all, 541 patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer underwent mp-MRI.Field StrengthT2 -weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging with a 3.0T MR scanner.AssessmentCandidate predictors included age, prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score (GS), and mp-MRI findings, ie, tumor location, Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, diameter (D-max), and 6-point MR stage. The PartinMR model with combination of a Partin table and mp-MRI findings was developed using SVM and 5-fold crossvalidation analysis.Statistical TestsThe predicted ability of the PartinMR model was compared with a standard Partin and a modified Partin table (mPartin) which used for mp-MRI staging. Statistical tests were made by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), adjusted proportional hazard ratio (HR), and a cost-effective benefit analysis.ResultsThe rate of OCPCA at prostatectomy was 46.4% (251/541). Using MR staging, mPartin table (AUC, 0.814, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.779-0.846, P = 0.001) is appreciably better than the Partin table (AUC, 0.730, 95% CI: 0.690-0.767). Contrarily, adding all MR variables, the PartinMR model (AUC, 0.891, 95% CI: 0.884-0.899, P < 0.001) outperformed any other scheme, with 79.3% sensitivity, 75.7% specificity, 79% positive predictive value, and 76.0% negative predictive value for OCPCA. MR stage represented the most influential predictor of extracapsular extension (HR, 2.77, 95% CI: 1.54-3.33), followed by D-max (2.01, 95% CI: 1.31-2.68), biopsy GS (1.64, 95% CI: 1.35-2.12), and PI-RADS score (1.21, 95% CI: 1.01-1.98).Data ConclusionThe new PartinMR model is superior to the conventional Partin table for OCPCA. Clinical implications of mp-MRI for prostate cancer stage must be confirmed in further trials.Level Of Evidence3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2018;48:499-506.© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.