-
- Toshiaki Matsuda, Hiroyuki Taniguchi, Masahiko Ando, Yasuhiro Kondoh, Tomoki Kimura, Kensuke Kataoka, Koji Sakamoto, Atsushi Suzuki, Taiki Furukawa, and Yoshinori Hasegawa.
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Tosei General Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
- Respirology. 2017 May 1; 22 (4): 721-727.
Background And ObjectiveThe COPD Assessment Test (CAT) has been reported to have potential utility for measuring health status of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although the CAT has been developed for the assessment of COPD patients, it has not been fully evaluated exclusively in IPF. This study was designed to evaluate the validity of the CAT in IPF.MethodsThe clinical data for 106 consecutive subjects with newly diagnosed IPF who completed pulmonary function tests, partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2 ) at rest, 6-min walk test (6MWT), CAT, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea grade and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), were analysed. We assessed the validity of the CAT in comparison with the SGRQ.ResultsThe present subjects showed mild to moderate restrictive impairment on spirometry. Mean CAT score and total SGRQ were 12.8 ± 8.0 and 30.8 ± 17.7, respectively. The concurrent validity of the CAT score in comparison with the SGRQ total score was significant (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.869) and repeatability over 3 months (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.742) of the CAT were also significant. Single regression analysis showed that the CAT had significant construct validity. In multiple regression analysis, mMRC, PaO2 at rest, minimum SpO2 during 6MWT and anxiety of HADS were independent predictors for the CAT.ConclusionsThe CAT is a valid health status measurement in IPF patients. Multiple regression analysis showed that the CAT was significantly correlated with dyspnoea severity, oxygenation impairment and anxiety.© 2016 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.