• Academic radiology · Dec 2013

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease.

    • Achim Seeger, Christian Braun, Marco Skardelly, Frank Paulsen, Jens Schittenhelm, Ulrike Ernemann, and Sotirios Bisdas.
    • Department of Neuroradiology, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
    • Acad Radiol. 2013 Dec 1; 20 (12): 1557-65.

    Rationale And ObjectivesMagnetic resonance (MR) perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy (MRS) provide specific physiological information that may allow distinction between recurrent glioma and progression from stable disease.Materials And MethodsForty patients underwent conventional MR imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted perfusion imaging, dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging (DSC), and multivoxel MRS. Arterial spin labeling was available in 26 of these patients. Quantitative parameters were calculated in tumor recurrences and stable disease, which were retrospectively verified on clinical and radiological follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic curves for each parameter were generated for the differentiation between recurrent glioma and stable disease. A forward discriminant analysis was undertaken to assess the power of the conjunction of MR perfusion techniques and MRS.ResultsOf the 40 patients, 23 were determined to have recurrent gliomas. Differences in arterial spin labeling between the two groups were not statistically significant (P = .063). Sensitivities and specificities for the detection of recurrent lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted perfusion imaging and DSC were 61.9% and 80% transfer constant k(trans), 77.3% and 84.6% for cerebral blood flow, and 81% and 76.9% for cerebral blood volume, respectively. Among the parameters in MRS, the ratio of choline to normalized creatine showed the best diagnostic accuracy (P = .014; sensitivity 70%, specificity 78.6%). When considering all perfusion modalities, diagnostic accuracy could be increased to 82.5%, adding MRS to the multiparametric approach resulted in a diagnostic accuracy of 90.0%.ConclusionsMR perfusion techniques and MRS are useful tools that enable improved differentiation between recurrent glioma and stable disease. Among the single parameters, DSC showed the best diagnostic performance. Multiparametric assessment substantially improved the ability to differentiate the two entities.Copyright © 2013 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.