• J Magn Reson Imaging · Mar 2020

    Radiomics and Machine Learning With Multiparametric Preoperative MRI May Accurately Predict the Histopathological Grades of Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

    • Hexiang Wang, Haisong Chen, Shaofeng Duan, Dapeng Hao, and Jihua Liu.
    • Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Mar 1; 51 (3): 791-797.

    BackgroundPreoperative prediction of the grade of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) is important because of its effect on treatment planning.PurposeTo assess the value of radiomics features in distinguishing histological grades of STSs.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationIn all, 113 patients with pathology-confirmed low-grade (grade I), intermediate-grade (grade II), or high-grade (grade III) soft tissue sarcoma were collected.Field Strength/SequenceThe 3.0T axial T1 -weighted imaging (T1 WI) with 550 msec repetition time (TR); 18 msec echo time (TE), 312 × 312 matrix, fat-suppressed fast spin-echo T2 WI with 4291 msec TR, 85 msec TE, 312 × 312 matrix.AssessmentMultiple machine-learning methods were trained to establish classification models for predicting STS grades. Eighty STS patients (18 low-grade [grade I]; 62 high-grade [grades II-III]) were enrolled in the primary set and we tested the model with a validation set with 33 patients (7 low-grade, 26 high-grade).Statistical Tests1) Student's t-tests were applied for continuous variables and the χ2 test were applied for categorical variables between low-grade STS and high-grade STS groups. 2) For feature subset selection, either no subset selection or recursive feature elimination was performed. This technology was combined with random forest and support vector machine-learning methods. Finally, to overcome the disparity in the frequencies of the STS grades, each machine-learning model was trained i) without subsampling, ii) with the synthetic minority oversampling technique, and iii) with random oversampling examples, for a total of 12 combinations of machine-learning algorithms that were assessed, trained, and tested in the validation cohort.ResultsThe best classification model for the prediction of STS grade was a combination of features selected by recursive feature elimination and random forest classification algorithms with a synthetic minority oversampling technique, which had an area under the curve of 0.9615 (95% confidence interval 0.8944-1.0) in the validation set.Data ConclusionRadiomics feature-based machine-learning methods are useful for distinguishing STS grades.Level Of Evidence3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:791-797.© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.