-
- R W Geckler, C K McAllister, D H Gremillion, and C Ellenbogen.
- Chest. 1985 May 1; 87 (5): 631-5.
AbstractOne hundred young adults with acute pneumonia were prospectively studied to determine the impact of the transtracheal aspiration (TTA) Gram stain on immediate management. Sputum and TTA interpretations by staff and housestaff were compared. After a management plan was elected based on sputum Gram stain interpretation, the TTA was evaluated and the final plan chosen. A change in treatment after the TTA was available occurred in eight cases, and this was an appropriate change in only five. The putative pathogen as identified by TTA culture was correctly predicted after sputum Gram stain interpretation in 36 to 62 percent of cases and after TTA interpretation in 37 to 62 percent. This indicates significant observer variation but not superiority of one type of specimen over the other. In most cases, paired sputum and TTA Gram stain were both read correctly or incorrectly. When differences occurred, sputum interpretations were as likely to be correct as were TTA interpretations. The TTA Gram stain offered no advantage over sputum Gram stain in the initial management of acute pneumonia in this young adult military population.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.