• Asli Akin Belli, Emine Dervis, Sirri Kar, Onder Ergonul, and Aysen Gargili.
• Department of Dermatology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University Training and Research Hospital, Mugla, Turkey. Electronic address: dr_asliakin@hotmail.com.
• J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1; 75 (2): 393-7.

BackgroundEarly and complete removal of ticks using the right technique is important to reduce tick-transmitted diseases. Several chemical and mechanical detachment techniques have been described previously.ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the performance of 4 tick-detachment techniques that are widely used in human beings and to determine the optimal method from these techniques.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 160 patients between April and June 2010. Patients with reported tick bite were reviewed retrospectively and divided into the following 4 groups according to the tick-detachment technique used: card detachment, lassoing, freezing, and tweezers. Performance of each technique was evaluated according to the number of fully detached, nondetached, and crushed ticks and the duration of application.ResultsOf the 160 tick-bite cases assessed, we found the following efficacy rates: 82.5% (33/40), technique using tweezers; 47.5% (19/40), lassoing technique; 7.5% (3/40), card detachment; and 0% (0/40), freezing technique. The efficacy rate of the technique using tweezers was significantly higher than that of the other 3 techniques (P < .05).LimitationsThis was a relatively small sample size and not designed as a randomized clinical trial.ConclusionTick detachment using tweezers, performed in an appropriate manner, is the easiest and most effective technique.Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…