• Radiology · Mar 2014

    Comparative Study

    Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with enhancement degree and histologic grade.

    • Sungmin Woo, Jeong Min Lee, Jeong Hee Yoon, Ijin Joo, Joon Koo Han, and Byung Ihn Choi.
    • From the Department of Radiology (S.W., J.M.L., J.H.Y., I.J., J.K.H., B.I.C.) and Institute of Radiation Medicine (J.M.L., J.K.H., B.I.C.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.
    • Radiology. 2014 Mar 1; 270 (3): 758-67.

    PurposeTo compare the association of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and evaluate the relationship between IVIM-derived parameters and arterial enhancement degree.Materials And MethodsThis retrospective study was institutional review board-approved, and informed consent was waived. Forty patients with 42 surgically confirmed HCCs underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with eight b values (0-800 sec/mm(2)). ADC, diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated. Two radiologists determined the enhancement degree in consensus, as well as the percentage of arterial enhancement of HCC. The relationship between the parameters and histologic grade, as well as arterial enhancement, was assessed by using the Spearman or Pearson correlation test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of discrimination between low-grade (grades 1 and 2) and high-grade (grades 3 and 4) HCC was performed for D and ADC values.ResultsD and ADC values were both significantly correlated with histologic grade: r = -0.604 (P < .0001) and r = -0.448 (P = .002), respectively. D and ADC values were both significantly lower in high-grade HCC (D = [0.99 ± 0.13] × 10(-3)mm(2)/sec, ADC = [1.13 ± 0.14] × 10(-3)mm(2)/sec) than in low-grade HCC (D = [1.18 ± 0.16] × 10(-3)mm(2)/sec, ADC = [1.25 ± 0.17] × 10-(3)mm(2)/sec) (P < .0001 and P = .029, respectively). However, ROC analysis demonstrated a higher area under the ROC curve value for D than for ADC for differentiating high-grade HCC from low-grade HCC (0.838 vs 0.728; P = .026). The percentage of arterial enhancement was correlated with f (r = 0.621, P < .0001).ConclusionIVIM-derived D values of HCC showed significantly better diagnostic performance than ADC values in differentiating high-grade HCC from low-grade HCC, and significant correlation was observed between f and the percentage of arterial enhancement.RSNA, 2013

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…