• O A Khan, R Clarke, H Arnot, C J Ranaboldo, A S Ghauri, and N J Carty.
• Department of Surgery, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, Wiltshire, U.K. omarkhan@iname.com
• Acta Chir Belg. 2011 Mar 1; 111 (2): 83-7.

BackgroundUrgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard for the treatment of acute gallstone disease. Since 2005 we have implemented a consultant-delivered urgent surgical service for this condition. In an attempt to increase the capacity of this service, we have recently introduced a new policy of also allowing selected trainee surgeons to perform urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with consultant assistance available on request. The purpose of this study was to audit our initial experience of this new service.MethodsPatients with acute gallstone disease had their surgery performed by a consultant or a trainee operating independently with consultant assistance available only on request. Allocation was based purely on surgeon availability. The clinical outcomes of 50 consecutive trainee and 50 consecutive consultant cases were compared and an attempt made to identify pre-operative predictors of technically-demanding trainee cases requiring consultant intervention.ResultsThe mean operating time of trainees was significantly longer than consultants (80 +/- 5 mins vs 55 +/- 4 mins, p <0.001) although the conversion rates for trainees (4%) and consultants (2%) were similar. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to postoperative morbidity. Of the 50 trainee cases, consultant intervention was required in 12 (24%) cases. There were no statistically significant pre-operative predictors of requirement for consultant assistance.ConclusionsUrgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be performed independently by appropriately skilled trainees within a consultant-led service. Although consultant intervention is often not required, the requirement for consultant assistance cannot be easily predicted based on pre-operative data.

20 keywords...

hide…