• Eur J Radiol · Feb 2008

    Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.

    • Hye-Jeong Lee, Eun-Kyung Kim, Min Jung Kim, Ji Hyun Youk, Ji Young Lee, Dae Ryong Kang, and Ki Keun Oh.
    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seodaemun-ku Shinchon-dong 134, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.
    • Eur J Radiol. 2008 Feb 1; 65 (2): 293-8.

    PurposeTo evaluate inter- and intra-observer variabilities in breast sonographic feature analysis and management, using the fourth edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).Materials And MethodsWe included 136 patients with 150 breast lesions who underwent breast ultrasound (US) and ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. A pathological diagnosis was available for all 150 lesions: 77 (51%) malignant and 73 (49%) benign. Four radiologists retrospectively reviewed sonographic images of lesions twice within an 8-week interval. The observers described each lesion, using BI-RADS descriptors and final assessment. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities were assessed with Cohen's kappa statistic. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) for final assessment were also calculated.ResultsFor inter-observer agreements for sonographic descriptors, substantial agreement for lesion calcification and final assessment (kappa=0.61 for both), moderate agreement for lesion shape, orientation, boundary, and posterior acoustic features (kappa=0.49, 0.56, 0.59, and 0.49, respectively), and fair agreement for lesion margin and echo pattern (kappa=0.33 and 0.37, respectively) were obtained. For intra-observer agreement, substantial to perfect agreement was found for almost all lesion descriptors and final assessments. NPV for final assessment category 3 was 95%. Positive predictive value (PPV) for final assessment categorized as 4 or 5 were as follows: category 4a, 26%; category 4b, 89%; category 4c, 90%; and category 5, 97%.ConclusionBecause inter- and intra-observer agreement with the BI-RADS lexicon for US is good, the use of BI-RADS lexicon can provide accurate and consistent description and assessment for breast US.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.