• J Am Coll Radiol · Dec 2007

    Recent trends in utilization rates of noncardiac thoracic imaging: an example of how imaging growth might be controlled.

    • David C Levin, Vijay M Rao, Laurence Parker, Andrea J Frangos, and Jonathan H Sunshine.
    • Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA. david.levin@mail.tju.edu
    • J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Dec 1; 4 (12): 886-9.

    PurposesTo study trends in the utilization of the various noncardiac thoracic imaging modalities in the Medicare population in recent years and to compare the roles of radiologists and nonradiologist physicians.Materials And MethodsThe Medicare Part B databases for 1996 through 2005 were reviewed. All Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition, codes pertaining to noninvasive imaging of noncardiac thoracic structures were selected and grouped into 5 categories: chest radiography (CXR), chest computed tomography (CT)/computed tomographic angiography (CTA), noncardiac radionuclide scans, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography. Utilization rates per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries were calculated. Medicare physician specialty codes were used to ascertain utilization by radiologists compared with nonradiologist physicians. Trends over the 9-year period were studied.ResultsIn 1996, a total of 1,044.1 noncardiac thoracic imaging examinations were performed per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries, increasing to 1,051.6 in 2005 (+1%). In the largest category, CXR, the utilization rate dropped from 995.2 in 1996 to 941.5 in 2005 (-5%). The radionuclide scan utilization rate also dropped, from 16.9 in 1996 to 8.3 in 2005 (-51%). By contrast, the chest CT/CTA utilization rate increased from 30.9 in 1996 to 99.7 in 2005 (+223%). The use of magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography and ultrasound in the thorax was minimal. In 2005, radiologists performed 91% of CXR studies, 97% of chest CT/CTA studies, and 94% of noncardiac chest radionuclide scans.ConclusionsThe overall utilization rate of noncardiac chest imaging in recent years has increased only minimally. Within the various categories, there has been a decline in CXR utilization and a substantial decline in radionuclide scan utilization. However, there has been a considerable increase in the utilization of chest CT/CTA. Radiologists strongly predominate in all aspects of noncardiac thoracic imaging. This seems to be a pattern in which the use of a newer and better technology, CT or CTA, gradually replaces older ones and overall utilization rates remain relatively flat. One reason for this seems to be the lack of major involvement by nonradiologist physicians who might be in a position to self-refer. It is in contradistinction to cardiac imaging, in which the utilization of radionuclide scans and echocardiography has sharply increased among cardiologists. These data suggest that utilization rates in imaging might be kept under control by eliminating the opportunity for self-referral.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…