• Björn A Blomberg, Arjun Bashyam, Abhinay Ramachandran, Saeid Gholami, Sina Houshmand, Ali Salavati, Tom Werner, Habib Zaidi, and Abass Alavi.
• Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands, b.a.blomberg@umcutrecht.nl.
• Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2015 Aug 1; 42 (9): 1414-22.

PurposeThe human arterial wall is smaller than the spatial resolution of current positron emission tomographs. Therefore, partial volume effects should be considered when quantifying arterial wall (18)F-FDG uptake. We evaluated the impact of a novel method for partial volume effect (PVE) correction with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) assistance on quantification of arterial wall (18)F-FDG uptake at different imaging time-points.MethodsTen subjects were assessed by CECT imaging and dual time-point PET/CT imaging at approximately 60 and 180 min after (18)F-FDG administration. For both time-points, uptake of (18)F-FDG was determined in the aortic wall by calculating the blood pool-corrected maximum standardized uptake value (cSUVMAX) and cSUVMEAN. The PVE-corrected SUVMEAN (pvcSUVMEAN) was also calculated using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CECT images. Finally, corresponding target-to-background ratios (TBR) were calculated.ResultsAt 60 min, pvcSUVMEAN was on average 3.1 times greater than cSUVMAX (P < .0001) and 8.5 times greater than cSUVMEAN (P < .0001). At 180 min, pvcSUVMEAN was on average 2.6 times greater than cSUVMAX (P < .0001) and 6.6 times greater than cSUVMEAN (P < .0001).ConclusionThis study demonstrated that CECT-assisted PVE correction significantly influences quantification of arterial wall (18)F-FDG uptake. Therefore, partial volume effects should be considered when quantifying arterial wall (18)F-FDG uptake with PET.

22 keywords...

hide…