• J Magn Reson Imaging · Dec 2021

    Radiomics Models Based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps for the Prediction of High-Grade Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison With Preoperative Biopsy.

    • Chao Han, Shuai Ma, Xiang Liu, Yi Liu, Changxin Li, Yaofeng Zhang, Xiaodong Zhang, and Xiaoying Wang.
    • Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Dec 1; 54 (6): 1892-1901.

    BackgroundIt is feasible to use magnetic resonance (MR)-based radiomics to distinguish high-grade from low-grade prostate cancer (PCa), but radiomics model performance based on fully automated segmentation remains unknown.PurposeTo develop and test radiomics models based on manually or automatically gained masks on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps to predict high-grade (Gleason score ≥ 4 + 3) PCa at radical prostatectomy (RP).Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationA total of 176 patients (94 high-grade PCa and 82 low-grade PCa) with complete RP, preoperative biopsy, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were retrospectively recruited and randomly divided into training (N = 123) and test (N = 53) cohorts.Field Strength/SequenceUsing a 3.0-T MR scanner, ADC maps were calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging (b values = 0, 1400 s/mm2 , echo planar imaging).AssessmentTwo radiologists segmented the whole prostate gland and the most index prostate lesion. Automatic segmentation of the prostate and the lesion were performed. Four radiomics models were constructed using four masks (manual/automatic prostate gland/PCa lesion segmentation). According to the standard reference of the RP histopathologic assessment, the performance of each radiomics models was compared with that of biopsy and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS) assessment.Statistical TestsA receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) values of the models. The AUCs of the four models, biopsy, and PI-RADS assessment were compared using the DeLong test.ResultsThe four radiomics models yielded AUCs of 0.710, 0.731, 0.726, and 0.709 in the test cohort, respectively; biopsy and PI-RADS assessment yielded AUCs of 0.793 and 0.680, respectively. No significant differences were found among model, biopsy, and PI-RADS assessment comparisons (P = 0.132-0.988).Data ConclusionTo distinguish high-grade from low-grade PCa, radiomics models based on automatic segmentation on ADC maps exhibit approximately the same diagnostic efficacy as manual segmentation and biopsy, highlighting the possibility of a fully automatic workflow combining automated segmentation with radiomics analysis.Evidence Level4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.