• Youssef Erfanian, Johannes Grueneisen, Julian Kirchner, Axel Wetter, Lars Erik Podleska, Sebastian Bauer, Thorsten Poeppel, Michael Forsting, Ken Herrmann, and Lale Umutlu.
• Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. Youssef.erfanian@uk-essen.de.
• Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2017 Oct 1; 44 (11): 1823-1831.

PurposeTo assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of PET/MRI and MRI alone for the detection of local recurrences of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) after initial surgical resection of the primary tumors.Material And MethodsA total of 41 patients with clinically suspected tumor relapse of STS underwent an 18F-FDG-PET/MRI examination for assessment of local recurrence. Two experienced physicians interpreted the MRI data and subsequently the PET/MRI datasets in two separate reading sessions and were instructed to identify potential local tumor recurrences. Additionally, the diagnostic confidence in each reading for the identification of malignant lesions was determined. A McNemar test was applied to test for differences of both ratings and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to identify differences of the confidence levels. Histopathological verification and follow-up imaging were applied for standard of reference.ResultsTumor relapse was present in 27/41 patients. Calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of local tumor recurrence was 82%, 86%, 92%, 71% and 83% for MRI, and 96%, 79%, 90%, 92% and 90% for PET/MRI (p > 0.05). Furthermore, PET/MRI showed significantly higher confidence levels (p < 0.05) for the determination of malignant lesions.ConclusionOur results endorse 18F-FDG PET/MRI to be an excellent imaging method in the evaluation of recurrent STS after surgical excision, yielding superior tumor detection when compared to MRI alone.

30 keywords...

hide…