• Investigative radiology · Jun 2013

    Clinical Trial

    Percutaneous abscess drainage using near real-time MR guidance in an open 1.0-T MR scanner: proof of concept.

    • Christian Wybranski, Katharina Strach, Felix Krenzien, Uta Wonneberger, Jürgen Bunke, Friedrich W Röhl, Ortrud Kosiek, Jens Ricke, and Frank Fischbach.
    • Department of Radiology, Otto von Guericke University Medical School, Magdeburg, Germany. christian.wybranski@med.ovgu.de
    • Invest Radiol. 2013 Jun 1; 48 (6): 477-84.

    ObjectivesThe aims of our study were (1) to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of exclusively magnetic resonance (MR)-guided freehand percutaneous abscesses drainage using a 1.0-T open MR scanner and (2) to evaluate the optimal method to visualize drainage catheters in situ.Material And MethodsIn vitro studies in a dedicated MR gelatin phantom were performed to assess visualization of 8 different sizes of drainage catheters after instillation of sole 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) and diluted (1.0%) or concentrated (12.0%) gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) using a T1-weighted (T1w) 2-dimensional fast field echo (FFE) and a T2-weighted single-shot (ssh) turbo spin-echo (TSE) fast dynamic sequence. The catheter artifacts were evaluated with regard to the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the artifact width using the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) method, and the artifact intensity, being the product of the CNR and the FWHM. We used the general linear model procedure as the global test and the Tukey studentized range test for post hoc analysis. In vivo MR-guided freehand drainage was prospectively performed in patients with increased systemic inflammation markers and abdominal, retroperitoneal, and pelvic abscess collections. This study had been approved by the institutional review board. All patients provided written informed consent. Technical success was the primary efficacy variable. The secondary efficacy variables were visibility of the puncture needle and drainage catheter artifact, using a qualitative 5-point rating scale, intervention and procedure time, and rate of postinterventional complications.ResultsThe FWHM, the CNR, and the artifact intensity of the drainage catheters filled with 0.9% NaCl or diluted or concentrated Gd-DTPA increased according to the drainage catheter size in an almost linear fashion in both image weighting (all P ≤ 0.006; all R(2) ≥ 0.73). The T1w FFE sequence yielded the highest FWHM, CNR, and artifact intensity of all groups, using 12.0% Gd-DTPA instillation (all P < 0.001), and the least FWHM and artifact intensity, using 1.0% Gd-DTPA instillation (all P < 0.022; all P < 0.009). The T2w ssh TSE yielded higher FWHM, using 12.0% Gd-DTPA instillation, whereas the CNR was higher for 0.9% NaCl instillation (all P < 0.001). Magnetic-resonance-guided abscess drainage was performed in 22 patients with 24 abdominal, retroperitoneal, or pelvic abscess collections. The technical success rate of in vivo MR-guided freehand drainage was 100%. Visibility of the puncture needle was excellent (≥4.4 [0.5] points). Visibility of the drainage catheters was rated with 3.9 (0.9) and 4.5 (0.8) points using T2w ssh TSE with 0.9% NaCl and 12.0% Gd-DTPA instillation as well as 4.8 (0.5) and 4.2 (0.8) points using T1w FFE with 1.0% and 12.0% Gd-DTPA instillation, respectively. The procedure and intervention time was 52.4 (16.4) minutes (range, 28-78 minutes) and 27.4 (7.2) minutes (range, 17-40 minutes). Two minor and no major complications were recorded.ConclusionsMagnetic-resonance-guided freehand percutaneous abscesses drainage using fast dynamic sequences in an open 1-T MR scanner is feasible, effective, and safe. Visualization of drainage catheters can be facilitated by instillation of 0.9% NaCl or diluted or concentrated contrast media.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.