• Cancer medicine · Sep 2020

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Raltitrexed versus 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open labeled, randomized, controlled, and multicenter clinical trial.

    • Pengwei Yan, Haitao Yin, Wenjie Guo, Xiangdong Sun, Feng Li, Shengfu Huang, Xiuhua Bian, Feijiang Wang, Fuzheng Zhang, Buhai Wang, Hongping Zhou, Chong Zhou, Li Yin, Xuesong Jiang, Ning Jiang, Jianfeng Wu, Juying Liu, Dan Song, and Xia He.
    • Department of Radiaotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
    • Cancer Med. 2020 Sep 1; 9 (17): 6166-6172.

    BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of raltitrexed (Saiweijian® ) plus cisplatin (SP regimen) and 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP regimen) as concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).MethodsEligible patients (N = 135) were allocated randomly in a ratio of 1:1 to receive CCRT with either SP or FP. At least 2 cycles of chemotherapy was administrated during radiotherapy. Progression free survival (PFS) was primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), loco-regional relapse free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and toxicity.ResultsIn this study, 68 patients received SP as CCRT, and 67 received FP. Objective responses were noted in 97.1% of the patients in the SP group and in 97.0% of the patients in the FP group (P = 1.00). At the end of a median 36 months follow-up period, the estimated 3-year PFS rates were 70.1% for SP and 66.6% for FP, respectively. The 3-year LRRFS, DMFS and OS rates were 88.9%, 74.7% and 84.0%, respectively, for the SP group, and 92.3%, 71.0% and 73.7%, respectively, for the FP group. Overall, there was no difference between treatment groups with regard to response or survival. The most frequent acute toxicities monitored in both groups were bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal side effects and oral mucositis (OM). The overall incidence of grade 3-4 OM in the FP group (47.8%) was higher than in the SP group (11.8%). However, the incidence of other adverse effects observed in both groups was similar (P > .05).ConclusionsThese data indicate that SP and FP therapies have similar efficacy in treating LA-NPC. The SP regimen showed a tolerable safety profile along with a lower frequency of severe OM and therefore, an improved life quality. In conclusion, SP was a well tolerated, effective, regimen for LA-NPC treatment.© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…