• Acad Med · Mar 2017

    Competent for Unsupervised Practice: Use of Pediatric Residency Training Milestones to Assess Readiness.

    • Su-Ting T Li, Daniel J Tancredi, Alan Schwartz, Ann P Guillot, Ann E Burke, R Franklin Trimm, Susan Guralnick, John D Mahan, Kimberly A Gifford, and Association of Pediatric Program Directors (APPD) Longitudinal Educational Assessment Research Network (LEARN) Validity of Resident Self-Assessment Group.
    • S.-T.T. Li is associate professor, vice chair of education, and pediatric program director, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California. D.J. Tancredi is associate professor, Department of Pediatrics and Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California. A. Schwartz is Michael Reese Endowed Professor of Medical Education, associate head, and director of research, Department of Medical Education, and research professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. A.P. Guillot is professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont. A.E. Burke is professor and pediatric program director, Department of Pediatrics, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio. R.F. Trimm is professor, vice chair, and pediatric program director, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama. S. Guralnick is associate professor, director of graduate medical education, and designated institutional officer, Office of Academic Affairs, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York. J.D. Mahan is professor, vice chair, and pediatric and pediatric nephrology fellowship program director, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital/Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. K.A. Gifford is assistant professor and pediatric program director, Department of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
    • Acad Med. 2017 Mar 1; 92 (3): 385-393.

    PurposeTo describe clinical skills progression during pediatric residency using the distribution of pediatric milestone assessments by subcompetency and year of training and to determine reasonable milestone expectations at time of graduation.MethodMulti-institutional cohort study of the milestones reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for all 21 pediatric subcompetencies. Most subcompetencies were measured using five milestone levels (1 = novice, 2 = advanced beginner, 3 = competent, 4 = proficient, 5 = master); 3 subcompetencies had only four levels defined.ResultsMilestone assessments for 2,030 pediatric residents in 47 programs during academic year 2013-2014 were obtained. There was significant variation in end-of-year milestone ratings for residents within each level of training, which decreased as training level increased. Most (78.9%; 434/550) graduating third-year pediatric residents received a milestone rating of ≥ 3 in all 21 subcompetencies; fewer (21.1%; 116/550) received a rating of ≥ 4 in all subcompetencies. Across all training levels, professionalism and interpersonal communication skills were rated highest; quality improvement was rated lowest.ConclusionsTrainees entered residency with a wide range of skills. As they advanced, skill variability within a training level decreased. Most graduating pediatric residents were still advancing on the milestone continuum toward proficiency and mastery, and an expectation of milestone ratings ≥ 4 in all categories upon graduation is unrealistic; milestone ratings ≥ 3 upon graduation may be more realistic. Understanding current pediatric residents' and graduates' skills can help to identify key areas that should be specifically targeted during training.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.