• Ankur Gulati, Tevfik F Ismail, Aamir Ali, Li-Yueh Hsu, Carla Gonçalves, Nizar A Ismail, Kaushiga Krishnathasan, Natasha Davendralingam, Pedro Ferreira, Brian P Halliday, Daniel A Jones, Ricardo Wage, Simon Newsome, Peter Gatehouse, David Firmin, Andrew Jabbour, Ravi G Assomull, Anthony Mathur, Dudley J Pennell, Andrew E Arai, and Sanjay K Prasad.
• Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
• JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug 1; 12 (8 Pt 2): 1699-1708.

ObjectivesThis study sought to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and examine the relationship between myocardial perfusion and adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling.BackgroundAlthough regarded as a nonischemic condition, DCM has been associated with microvascular dysfunction, which is postulated to play a role in its pathogenesis. However, the relationship of the resulting perfusion abnormalities to myocardial fibrosis and the degree of LV remodeling is unclear.MethodsA total of 65 patients and 35 healthy control subjects underwent adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement imaging. Stress and rest MBF and MPR were derived using a modified Fermi-constrained deconvolution algorithm.ResultsPatients had significantly higher global rest MBF compared with control subjects (1.73 ± 0.42 ml/g/min vs. 1.14 ± 0.42 ml/g/min; p < 0.001). In contrast, global stress MBF was significantly lower versus control subjects (3.07 ± 1.02 ml/g/min vs. 3.53 ± 0.79 ml/g/min; p = 0.02), resulting in impaired MPR in the DCM group (1.83 ± 0.58 vs. 3.50 ± 1.45; p < 0.001). Global stress MBF (2.70 ± 0.89 ml/g/min vs. 3.44 ± 1.03 ml/g/min; p = 0.017) and global MPR (1.67 ± 0.61 vs. 1.99 ± 0.50; p = 0.047) were significantly reduced in patients with DCM with LV ejection fraction ≤35% compared with those with LV ejection fraction >35%. Segments with fibrosis had lower rest MBF (mean difference: -0.12 ml/g/min; 95% confidence interval: -0.23 to -0.01 ml/g/min; p = 0.035) and lower stress MBF (mean difference: -0.15 ml/g/min; 95% confidence interval: -0.28 to -0.03 ml/g/min; p = 0.013).ConclusionsPatients with DCM exhibit microvascular dysfunction, the severity of which is associated with the degree of LV impairment. However, rest MBF is elevated rather than reduced in DCM. If microvascular dysfunction contributes to the pathogenesis of DCM, then the underlying mechanism is more likely to involve stress-induced repetitive stunning rather than chronic myocardial hypoperfusion.Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

40 keywords...

hide…